Dossenator wrote:Eric wrote:There are surrounding circumstances in every game. The James Madison loss was just a hangover effect type game. I mean James Madison did only finish 6-6 in the CAA, but that's not much different from being a 5-7 C-USA team or something like that. The CAA is basically the equivalent of a mediocre non-BCS conference. I like the system the way it is set up. You can hold the James Madison loss against them as a negation, but does running the table in a conference like the ACC count for anything?
Just let the BCS conference winners be in the BCS. Only stipulation I would put on it is that they need to be in the top 20 of the BCS standings.
I think that says something about the ACC....there conference champ lost to a 6-6 FCS school. That just blows me away. It should never happen on 5 days rest or 1 hour of rest. I would be equally as shocked is a 5-7 C-USA team went to Virginia Tech and won the game.
Nobody is saying that the ACC is fantastic this year (I think this is the lowest it has been in the past few years, but I think it was underrated during a general span between 05-09). The fact remains though, if you run the table in a BCS conference, odds are you are pretty good.