CollegeFootballPoll.com Message Board

That blown call where the player dropped the ball on the 1 before crossing counting as a TD is a joke. Changed the whole game.

GoBoilers wrote:That blown call where the player dropped the ball on the 1 before crossing counting as a TD is a joke. Changed the whole game.

Yeah, but it probably made all Ohio St fans happy. I would guess the officials are catholic. Not sure that was not reviewed.

I never root for Notre Dame in anything, ever. Even this game. Besides now that they are in the other division, they don't have any impact on Ohio State - just another team.

Spence wrote:I never root for Notre Dame in anything, ever. Even this game. Besides now that they are in the other division, they don't have any impact on Ohio State - just another team.

Ditto my friend! This is the only game Michigan can ever play where I won't root against them!

Spence wrote:I never root for Notre Dame in anything, ever. Even this game. Besides now that they are in the other division, they don't have any impact on Ohio State - just another team.

I can't help but think you're letting artificial set-ups influence your perception of the rivalry. It's okay--you can hate us; we still hate you guys too!

I'll never quit hating the blue, but they have ended the rivalry. We may as well play for a turtle shell or something. That is what is it reduced to and it is a shame, because the win was always the trophy in years past. The B-10 has always tried to force this Penn State rivalry with Ohio State. Paterno has always wanted it as well. I guess they finally have made Penn State a more important game to Ohio State.

Well Eric...

Robinson looked as good against notre dame as Forcier did.

And nd's defense played just as well as they did in last year's meeting with the Wolverines.

How is it, that notre dame can always be the one team, who has a massive touchdown winning drive ( 95 yard pass ), turn out to be the one drive that cost them the game.?.

Didn't run enough time off the clock.

.


.

.

Cane from the Bend wrote:Well Eric...

Robinson looked as good against notre dame as Forcier did.

And nd's defense played just as well as they did in last year's meeting with the Wolverines.

How is it, that notre dame can always be the one team, who has a massive touchdown winning drive ( 95 yard pass ), turn out to be the one drive that cost them the game.?.

Didn't run enough time off the clock.

.


.

.

Yep, I was wrong and I'm glad

Robinson was extremely impressive and I don't think it's hyperbole to suggest that he could be an early Heisman candidate. Obviously, Michigan will have to compete for the Big 10 championship this season which I still think is a longshot, but if the offense can keep moving the football as well as they have shown themselves capable of doing, then it's a remote possibility.

Defensively, the secondary looked horrendous. They need to get that fixed and I heavily doubt Greg Robinson will have the answers. But I'm excited about the future!.....For once!

I was actually pulling for, gulp, the U of M in this game too, simply because going forward what Coach Kelly can do for a team scares me much more than what coach Rich-Rod can.

Jason G wrote:I was actually pulling for, gulp, the U of M in this game too, simply because going forward what Coach Kelly can do for a team scares me much more than what coach Rich-Rod can.

Yeah, I fully expect Notre Dame to be the USC of the 2010s.