Is History Reating?

Say it all here
Forum rules
NOTICE: Please be sure to check the CFP Message Board Rules and Regulations and the Read Me page before posting.
User avatar
Cane from the Bend
Athletic Director
Athletic Director
Posts: 5344
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 1:25 am
Location: South Bend, IN (domerville usa)
Contact:

Is History Reating?

Postby Cane from the Bend » Sat Oct 16, 2010 5:53 am

In 2003, Auburn finished the season 8-5, and many said they were on a down hill slide.

At the start of the 2004 season, the polls reflected that same assumption, by not preranking the Tigers.

By the end of the year, the media tried their best to correct their mistake, jumping Auburn in leaps over teams who had been in the rankings all season, some teams who were undefeated at the time, in order to push them into position, if either Oklahoma or usc were to have lost a game...

That year, Auburn finish 13-0, with a win over Virginia Tech in the Sugar Bowl.

Last year, Auburn finished 8-5, though few gave them much credit for it.

They are currently 6-0, half way through their schedule, and there weren't a lot of bandwagoners promoting the Tig`s as they started their 2010 campaign.

Could the lack of attention be playing into Aubies' hands?

Now, I'm not assuming anything myself... though, one can easily see the parallel here.

Auburn wasn't taken that seriously to begin the season, yet, they have played well, and win.

They are balanced, and undefeated. That is what you want in your team.

Just have a look at Michigan St.

They are also presently unbeaten, because of their unselfish balanced team co-operation.

That is how Auburn has been playing this year... Auburn still has to run into Alabama, LSU, not to mention ( eventhough I am ) Arkansas, who they are up against today.

If the Tigers beat the Hogs... what if?

.

.

.
Cane... [__]

"It is only impossible until it has been accomplished." ... then it becomes standardized ...

Success is measured by results; whereas Character is measured through the means by which one achieves those results . . .

It seems the Rapture did come for two worthy souls:
In Memory of Grandpa Howdy
In Memory of Donovan Davisson

User avatar
WoVeU
Athletic Director
Athletic Director
Posts: 6074
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 9:55 pm
Location: New Braunfels, Texas
Contact:

Re: Is History Reating?

Postby WoVeU » Sat Oct 16, 2010 8:34 am

Aubrun is on a path of destiny...but destiny didn't know what an Arkansas was. :D
Government exists to protect us from each other. Where government has gone beyond its limits is in deciding to protect us from ourselves.
If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.
R. Reagan

User avatar
Cane from the Bend
Athletic Director
Athletic Director
Posts: 5344
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 1:25 am
Location: South Bend, IN (domerville usa)
Contact:

Re: Is History Reating?

Postby Cane from the Bend » Sat Oct 16, 2010 11:50 am

Then again... Hogs on a rotisserie & destiny have a certain flare to it, don't they? :lol:

.

.

.
Cane... [__]

"It is only impossible until it has been accomplished." ... then it becomes standardized ...

Success is measured by results; whereas Character is measured through the means by which one achieves those results . . .

It seems the Rapture did come for two worthy souls:
In Memory of Grandpa Howdy
In Memory of Donovan Davisson

User avatar
Derek
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 6112
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2005 2:04 am
Location: Brooks, GA
Contact:

Re: Is History Reating?

Postby Derek » Sat Oct 16, 2010 3:44 pm

WoVeU wrote:Aubrun is on a path of destiny...but destiny didn't know what an Arkansas was. :D


After today...I'm not so sure that Ga can't beat them.
They’re either going to run the ball here or their going to pass it.

The fewer rules a coach has, the fewer rules there are for players to break.

See, well ya see, the thing is, he should have caught that ball. But the ball is bigger than his hands.

- John Madden

User avatar
Eric
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 1:51 am

Re: Is History Reating?

Postby Eric » Sat Oct 16, 2010 3:47 pm

Georgia is looking better. They still have to pick one off between Georgia Tech, Florida, and Auburn in order to qualify for a bowl game this year. I think they'll do it, Georgia Tech is looking pretty average and not like the ACC champs they were last season.
Running bowl/MSU/OSU record '05-present: 11-32

User avatar
WoVeU
Athletic Director
Athletic Director
Posts: 6074
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 9:55 pm
Location: New Braunfels, Texas
Contact:

Re: Is History Reating?

Postby WoVeU » Sat Oct 16, 2010 5:31 pm

Eric wrote:Georgia is looking better. They still have to pick one off between Georgia Tech, Florida, and Auburn in order to qualify for a bowl game this year. I think they'll do it, Georgia Tech is looking pretty average and not like the ACC champs they were last season.


Georgia will beat Tech and I think Florida too. Maybe all 3.
Government exists to protect us from each other. Where government has gone beyond its limits is in deciding to protect us from ourselves.
If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.
R. Reagan

User avatar
Derek
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 6112
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2005 2:04 am
Location: Brooks, GA
Contact:

Re: Is History Reating?

Postby Derek » Sat Oct 16, 2010 7:20 pm

WoVeU wrote:
Eric wrote:Georgia is looking better. They still have to pick one off between Georgia Tech, Florida, and Auburn in order to qualify for a bowl game this year. I think they'll do it, Georgia Tech is looking pretty average and not like the ACC champs they were last season.


Georgia will beat Tech and I think Florida too. Maybe all 3.


I don't know, that's a VERY tall order. But I'm so happy at the apparent turn around that I feel as giddy as school girl.

I don't know what turned it around...but somebody lit a fire under that defense.
They’re either going to run the ball here or their going to pass it.

The fewer rules a coach has, the fewer rules there are for players to break.

See, well ya see, the thing is, he should have caught that ball. But the ball is bigger than his hands.

- John Madden

User avatar
WoVeU
Athletic Director
Athletic Director
Posts: 6074
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 9:55 pm
Location: New Braunfels, Texas
Contact:

Re: Is History Reating?

Postby WoVeU » Sat Oct 16, 2010 7:23 pm

Derek wrote:
WoVeU wrote:
Eric wrote:Georgia is looking better. They still have to pick one off between Georgia Tech, Florida, and Auburn in order to qualify for a bowl game this year. I think they'll do it, Georgia Tech is looking pretty average and not like the ACC champs they were last season.


Georgia will beat Tech and I think Florida too. Maybe all 3.


I don't know, that's a VERY tall order. But I'm so happy at the apparent turn around that I feel as giddy as school girl.

I don't know what turned it around...but somebody lit a fire under that defense.


Hold your plaid skirt down there big fella! And no, I don't want to buy any cookies. :D
Government exists to protect us from each other. Where government has gone beyond its limits is in deciding to protect us from ourselves.
If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.
R. Reagan

User avatar
Brian Roastbeef
Assistant Coach
Assistant Coach
Posts: 410
Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 2:58 pm

Re: Is History Reating?

Postby Brian Roastbeef » Sat Oct 16, 2010 10:28 pm

I'm wasn't certain if 2010 Auburn is like 2004 Auburn, or if they are more like Purdue from the middle of the last decade, when it seemed as if just about every season they would start 5-0, but finish 7-5. Hard to see Auburn as worse than 10-2 now. They seem pretty solid, and passed a big test. Of course, the bigger test is next week.

User avatar
Derek
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 6112
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2005 2:04 am
Location: Brooks, GA
Contact:

Re: Is History Reating?

Postby Derek » Sun Oct 17, 2010 12:16 am

Brian Roastbeef wrote:I'm wasn't certain if 2010 Auburn is like 2004 Auburn, or if they are more like Purdue from the middle of the last decade, when it seemed as if just about every season they would start 5-0, but finish 7-5. Hard to see Auburn as worse than 10-2 now. They seem pretty solid, and passed a big test. Of course, the bigger test is next week.


I'm really interested to see what goes on with that game. I'll be in Newfoundland, so I won't be able to watch much.

This will be the game to watch next week.
They’re either going to run the ball here or their going to pass it.

The fewer rules a coach has, the fewer rules there are for players to break.

See, well ya see, the thing is, he should have caught that ball. But the ball is bigger than his hands.

- John Madden

User avatar
Brian Roastbeef
Assistant Coach
Assistant Coach
Posts: 410
Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 2:58 pm

Re: Is History Reating?

Postby Brian Roastbeef » Sun Oct 17, 2010 12:55 am

Derek wrote:This will be the game to watch next week.


Yeah. That, Oklahoma vs. Missouri, and for the sake of tradition, Notre Dame/Navy.

TCU/Air Force could be interesting, but after today, I expect that will be a romp.

User avatar
Eric
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 1:51 am

Re: Is History Reating?

Postby Eric » Sun Oct 17, 2010 1:06 am

Brian Roastbeef wrote:
Derek wrote:This will be the game to watch next week.


Yeah. That, Oklahoma vs. Missouri, and for the sake of tradition, Notre Dame/Navy.

TCU/Air Force could be interesting, but after today, I expect that will be a romp.


I didn't think there was any justification for Air Force being ranked. I think they've had one quality win against Navy. The sole reason the team jumped into the public perception was because they beat up on BYU by two scores, but we all realize how mediocre they are now.
Running bowl/MSU/OSU record '05-present: 11-32

User avatar
Brian Roastbeef
Assistant Coach
Assistant Coach
Posts: 410
Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 2:58 pm

Re: Is History Reating?

Postby Brian Roastbeef » Sun Oct 17, 2010 1:14 am

Eric wrote:
Brian Roastbeef wrote:
Derek wrote:This will be the game to watch next week.


Yeah. That, Oklahoma vs. Missouri, and for the sake of tradition, Notre Dame/Navy.

TCU/Air Force could be interesting, but after today, I expect that will be a romp.


I didn't think there was any justification for Air Force being ranked. I think they've had one quality win against Navy. The sole reason the team jumped into the public perception was because they beat up on BYU by two scores, but we all realize how mediocre they are now.


For me it was more because they hung on close with an Oklahoma team that had just mercilessly beaten the ever living snot out of Florida State.


Return to “General Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests