CollegeFootballPoll.com Message Board

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xqg3ldlbb00

A funny little video

Ridiculous. I've also seen something VERY funny lately from her.....I can't explain it all...But notice how he says Maam...SEVERAL times. LOL!!!

The head of the Black Chamber of Commerce absolutely wears her out!!

ttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4FoekBjhtWE

Man that was good Derek.

He gave it to her without remorse. Good for him! She was absolutely trying to play some racial posturing! The woman is ridiculous, who the Hell is voting for these people. We need an IQ test before we let people run. Then we need to throw them in a room and hand them a topic (of which they have foreknowledge) and have them speak on it. This is ridiculous. We have many people on this board who are much higher qualified than than the Representatives we currently have! It is an utter embarrassment to me! (Let's understand the whole world can listen in to these people.)

Agree

WoVeU...well the nuts in CA voted for Boxer, and Feinstein, and Nancy Pelosi...they are crazy out here. I for one never voted for any of them and never will.

The general in this case was trying to show respect to the senator by calling her ma'am. That is what they are trained to do as a military men. This lady needs to get over herself....and she needs to apologize for her behavior if you ask me.

I've read she's in the fight of her political career in the next election. Don't know how true it is.

What, is she running against a moderately trained Orangutan? They are quite the challenging orators and debaters...with that "left turn Clyde" and all that! Clever B@5&@^ds!!!

Dossenator wrote:WoVeU...well the nuts in CA voted for Boxer, and Feinstein, and Nancy Pelosi...they are crazy out here. I for one never voted for any of them and never will.

The general in this case was trying to show respect to the senator by calling her ma'am. That is what they are trained to do as a military men. This lady needs to get over herself....and she needs to apologize for her behavior if you ask me.

Brother I don't know how you do it! Even young, modern, rather liberal people here in Texas think those people are nuts!

Not many people on the West Coast think Boxer and Peolosi serves anyones interest. They are non representative of much of anything.......But......not sure that the East Coast has done much better electing people of character.....a broken system does not favor any one political party....enough "junk" to go around.

donovan wrote:Not many people on the West Coast think Boxer and Peolosi serves anyones interest. They are non representative of much of anything.......But......not sure that the East Coast has done much better electing people of character.....a broken system does not favor any one political party....enough "junk" to go around.

I agree and the east coast is just as bad. Most in the middle have a hand in it too.

I don't buy much into conspiracy theories. But with these reps we have I really have to wonder if the whole thing isn't just a big show and pretense. Can you have a few hundred people this incapable...who also happen to be setting on big bank accounts and other things that are alleged to point towards one having knowledge, skills, and abilities. Whatever the case, there is more going on in DC than meets the eye!

donovan wrote:Not many people on the West Coast think Boxer and Peolosi serves anyones interest. They are non representative of much of anything.......But......not sure that the East Coast has done much better electing people of character.....a broken system does not favor any one political party....enough "junk" to go around.

Oh, not just West Coast my friend. California is just king of that hill! On the east coast there is usually a 3 to 4-way race. Jersey, New York, Mass., and Vermont. Of late I think that Mass is out in the lead by a few lengths at the present.

And I for one think the West - East Coast perception of Liberal and Conservative is rather inaccurate, or when they find East and West serves highly in typing the Liberals and Conservatives. I think it is population....urban areas with nice suburban sprawl seems to have moderate liberals, those with a brain and mostly want things I want. The BIG Urban areas has the real crazy liberals...and crazy conservatives...it is like if you get enough people together it is a race to see who can be more extreme. Well, honestly, I have witnessed this behavior in groups of people in many areas...I think people want to stand-out...even more than they want to have good merit!

And of course Conservatives, in my finding, in those urban areas with suburban sprawl, are often hard for me to get a grasp on. They seem a bit different here and there and their mindset seems to be notably tempered to the local economy. (A good amount of "Conservatives" are just greedy, I only "care about me" types. They only vote around their money...I think those types stir the straw in the local drink. Enough so to give certain areas a more distinct bias from the core.)

WoVeU wrote:And of course Conservatives, in my finding, in those urban areas with suburban sprawl, are often hard for me to get a grasp on. They seem a bit different here and there and their mindset seems to be notably tempered to the local economy. (A good amount of "Conservatives" are just greedy, I only "care about me" types. They only vote around their money...I think those types stir the straw in the local drink. Enough so to give certain areas a more distinct bias from the core.)

Yes, there is a difference IMO between being a conservative that votes for themselves and ones that vote for the long term interest of the country or their state. Sometimes voting for whats best in the long run will make you EXTREMELY unpopular with lib's, moderates, or even some Arlen Specter Style Republicans.

I call them Populist Republicans....meaning they are more Democrats than true conservative Republicans.

Derek wrote:

WoVeU wrote:And of course Conservatives, in my finding, in those urban areas with suburban sprawl, are often hard for me to get a grasp on. They seem a bit different here and there and their mindset seems to be notably tempered to the local economy. (A good amount of "Conservatives" are just greedy, I only "care about me" types. They only vote around their money...I think those types stir the straw in the local drink. Enough so to give certain areas a more distinct bias from the core.)

Yes, there is a difference IMO between being a conservative that votes for themselves and ones that vote for the long term interest of the country or their state. Sometimes voting for whats best in the long run will make you EXTREMELY unpopular with lib's, moderates, or even some Arlen Specter Style Republicans.

I call them Populist Republicans....meaning they are more Democrats than true conservative Republicans.

Good thing we don't have too many of those running around!