Final Bowl Projections

Say it all here
Forum rules
NOTICE: Please be sure to check the CFP Message Board Rules and Regulations and the Read Me page before posting.
User avatar
Eric
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 1:51 am

Re: Final Bowl Projections

Postby Eric » Sun Dec 05, 2010 9:15 pm

Dossenator wrote:
Eric wrote:There are surrounding circumstances in every game. The James Madison loss was just a hangover effect type game. I mean James Madison did only finish 6-6 in the CAA, but that's not much different from being a 5-7 C-USA team or something like that. The CAA is basically the equivalent of a mediocre non-BCS conference. I like the system the way it is set up. You can hold the James Madison loss against them as a negation, but does running the table in a conference like the ACC count for anything?

Just let the BCS conference winners be in the BCS. Only stipulation I would put on it is that they need to be in the top 20 of the BCS standings.


I think that says something about the ACC....there conference champ lost to a 6-6 FCS school. That just blows me away. It should never happen on 5 days rest or 1 hour of rest. I would be equally as shocked is a 5-7 C-USA team went to Virginia Tech and won the game.


Nobody is saying that the ACC is fantastic this year (I think this is the lowest it has been in the past few years, but I think it was underrated during a general span between 05-09). The fact remains though, if you run the table in a BCS conference, odds are you are pretty good.
Running bowl/MSU/OSU record '05-present: 11-32

User avatar
donovan
Athletic Director
Athletic Director
Posts: 8634
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 6:41 am
Location: Pacific Northwest

Re: Final Bowl Projections

Postby donovan » Mon Dec 06, 2010 12:26 am

We certainly needed the BCS to pick those top two teams.....and those are the only ones the BCS cares about....
Statistics are the Morphine of College Football

User avatar
Brian Roastbeef
Assistant Coach
Assistant Coach
Posts: 410
Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 2:58 pm

Re: Final Bowl Projections

Postby Brian Roastbeef » Mon Dec 06, 2010 2:13 am

Of course, though I agree that the James Madison loss reflects poorly on Virginia Tech, that does raise the question of how far the transitive property stretches...

Andrew Golota drew Chris Byrd beat Vitali Klitschko beat Shannon Briggs beat George Foreman beat Ken Norton beat Muhammad Ali

Is Andrew Golota then better than Muhammad Ali, or even Vitali Klitschko (one of the current legitimate heavyweight champions today)? Does James Madison have claim over the entire ACC? As the above list of fighters goes through George Foreman in his absolute decline, is there similar claim that James Madison got Virginia Tech during the weaker part of their season? Don't know that I have any answers here, just more questions... of course there would be far fewer opportunities for such confusion if 1-A teams played fewer 1-AAs (or FCS if you simply must be current :P ).


Return to “General Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests