Utah...product of it's schedule

Say it all here
Forum rules
NOTICE: Please be sure to check the CFP Message Board Rules and Regulations and the Read Me page before posting.
Post Reply
User avatar
Spence
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 21235
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Chillicothe, Ohio (Ohio's First Capital)
Contact:
Contact Spence

Re: Utah...product of it's schedule

Postby Spence » Sun Nov 07, 2010 2:05 pm

billybud wrote:Auburn plays defense too?


I guess it is relative, but yeah
"History doesn't always repeat itself but it often rhymes." - Mark Twain
Top
User avatar
Brian Roastbeef
Assistant Coach
Assistant Coach
Posts: 410
Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 2:58 pm

Re: Utah...product of it's schedule

Postby Brian Roastbeef » Sun Nov 07, 2010 3:29 pm

Spence wrote:
billybud wrote:Auburn plays defense too?


I guess it is relative, but yeah


That being relative to Michigan and Illinois.
Top
billybud
Athletic Director
Athletic Director
Posts: 10733
Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2006 12:25 pm

Re: Utah...product of it's schedule

Postby billybud » Sun Nov 07, 2010 3:42 pm

LOL....nice one.
“If short hair and good manners won football games, Army and Navy would play for the national championship every year.”
Top
User avatar
Spence
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 21235
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Chillicothe, Ohio (Ohio's First Capital)
Contact:
Contact Spence

Re: Utah...product of it's schedule

Postby Spence » Sun Nov 07, 2010 6:20 pm

Brian Roastbeef wrote:
Spence wrote:
billybud wrote:Auburn plays defense too?


I guess it is relative, but yeah


That being relative to Michigan and Illinois.


Anyone Michigan plays has potential to score 70. :wink:
"History doesn't always repeat itself but it often rhymes." - Mark Twain
Top
User avatar
Brian Roastbeef
Assistant Coach
Assistant Coach
Posts: 410
Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 2:58 pm

Re: Utah...product of it's schedule

Postby Brian Roastbeef » Sun Nov 07, 2010 6:56 pm

Spence wrote:
Brian Roastbeef wrote:
Spence wrote:
billybud wrote:Auburn plays defense too?


I guess it is relative, but yeah


That being relative to Michigan and Illinois.


Anyone Michigan plays has potential to score 70. :wink:


Don't be thinking about that yet, buddy. First you have a Penn State team that has been looking noticeably stronger over these past few weeks...
Top
User avatar
Spence
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 21235
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Chillicothe, Ohio (Ohio's First Capital)
Contact:
Contact Spence

Re: Utah...product of it's schedule

Postby Spence » Sun Nov 07, 2010 7:34 pm

Ohio State's season was over a few weeks ago. We just have to finish out, get the new recruits in, and start again next year.
"History doesn't always repeat itself but it often rhymes." - Mark Twain
Top
User avatar
WoVeU
Athletic Director
Athletic Director
Posts: 6074
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 9:55 pm
Location: New Braunfels, Texas
Contact:
Contact WoVeU

Re: Utah...product of it's schedule

Postby WoVeU » Sun Nov 07, 2010 8:26 pm

billybud wrote:The over/under for a Auburn vs Oregon match would have to be 110,


It couldn't be too short of that! I'd think 92 real easy.
Government exists to protect us from each other. Where government has gone beyond its limits is in deciding to protect us from ourselves.
If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.
R. Reagan
Top
User avatar
RazorHawk
Athletic Director
Athletic Director
Posts: 3627
Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 6:30 pm
Location: Inverness, FL
Contact:
Contact RazorHawk

Re: Utah...product of it's schedule

Postby RazorHawk » Sun Nov 07, 2010 9:00 pm

Spence wrote:Ohio State's season was over a few weeks ago. We just have to finish out, get the new recruits in, and start again next year.

Let me see, both my teams have two losses and feel they can both have a good season. Neither will probably make a BCS bowl, but should wind up in a pretty good bowl. I am still excited about the season.

The Ohio State University has lost one game and the season is over. Wow, must be hard to be a Buckeye fan.
Hawkeye and Razorback fan in Florida
Top
User avatar
Spence
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 21235
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Chillicothe, Ohio (Ohio's First Capital)
Contact:
Contact Spence

Re: Utah...product of it's schedule

Postby Spence » Sun Nov 07, 2010 11:12 pm

One of your teams is lots better than their record. Arkansas is a very good football team this year.
"History doesn't always repeat itself but it often rhymes." - Mark Twain
Top
User avatar
RazorHawk
Athletic Director
Athletic Director
Posts: 3627
Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 6:30 pm
Location: Inverness, FL
Contact:
Contact RazorHawk

Re: Utah...product of it's schedule

Postby RazorHawk » Mon Nov 08, 2010 6:03 am

Spence wrote:One of your teams is lots better than their record. Arkansas is a very good football team this year.
But by your standards their season was over when they lost to Alabama.

I do think Arkansas to be better than Iowa, of course this may just be an "SEC > Big 10" thing.
Hawkeye and Razorback fan in Florida
Top
User avatar
silverfox
Coordinator
Coordinator
Posts: 665
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 12:31 pm
Location: Philippines and the USA
Contact:
Contact silverfox

Re: Utah...product of it's schedule

Postby silverfox » Mon Nov 08, 2010 7:37 am

RazorHawk wrote:
Spence wrote:One of your teams is lots better than their record. Arkansas is a very good football team this year.
But by your standards their season was over when they lost to Alabama.

I do think Arkansas to be better than Iowa, of course this may just be an "SEC > Big 10" thing.


NOT!

Cuz I certainly agree with you. :P
Win or Lose - IT'S HOW YOU HYPE THE OUTCOME! BCS logic: When teams in the AQ conferences lose, it shows how tough those conferences are; when teams in non-AQ conferences lose, it is weakness.
Top
User avatar
Spence
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 21235
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Chillicothe, Ohio (Ohio's First Capital)
Contact:
Contact Spence

Re: Utah...product of it's schedule

Postby Spence » Mon Nov 08, 2010 9:54 am

RazorHawk wrote:
Spence wrote:One of your teams is lots better than their record. Arkansas is a very good football team this year.
But by your standards their season was over when they lost to Alabama.

I do think Arkansas to be better than Iowa, of course this may just be an "SEC > Big 10" thing.


I don't think it is an SEC -Big 10 thing because I believe it too and I don't have any special interest in the SEC. Arkansas is a top 5 team - strength wise - IMO. There won loss record is hurting them in the polls. People are giving Alabama the benefit of the doubt - or were giving them - but I believe Arkansas is the one team in the SEC that no one else wants to face.

Nothing against Iowa. They are a decent team. Stanzi is the wild card with the Hawks. When he plays smart he is something to watch, but he gets some monumental brain cramps from time to time that hurts the team. They can beat anyone they play, the problem is you never know which QB you are going to get.
"History doesn't always repeat itself but it often rhymes." - Mark Twain
Top
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests