Heads-Up

Say it all here
Forum rules
NOTICE: Please be sure to check the CFP Message Board Rules and Regulations and the Read Me page before posting.
User avatar
Mountainman
Athletic Director
Athletic Director
Posts: 2862
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2018 9:42 am

Heads-Up

Postby Mountainman » Tue Feb 15, 2022 11:50 am

Oh Goodie!!!!!!! Another Clown Show!!!!!

I wonder who will ‘Take My Ball and Go Home’ this time around……. :roll:


https://www.si.com/college/2022/02/14/c ... arly-march


.
.
”We’re already in a time where the on-field aspect of College Football is almost a distraction. It’s an era filled with handwringing about player empowerment, NCAA deregulation, the transfer portal and realignment all while the sport generally moves toward a professional model.” ~ Dennis Dodd

User avatar
Spence
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 21229
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Chillicothe, Ohio (Ohio's First Capital)
Contact:

Re: Heads-Up

Postby Spence » Tue Feb 15, 2022 1:34 pm

It seems to me that for right now the SEC holds most of the cards. They B1G holds a few, nobody else has any. They only way the conferences can flip the script is to have an all or none approach to in season scheduling an playoffs. If the ACC, B12, B1G and PAC 12 decide to do it a certain way and they won't schedule with the SEC at all unless they agree, that reduces the SEC's leverage. Of course right now the SEC isn't really standing in the way. It is the other group not being able to stand as a group. It will be interesting to see what happens.
"History doesn't always repeat itself but it often rhymes." - Mark Twain

User avatar
Cane from the Bend
Athletic Director
Athletic Director
Posts: 5343
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 1:25 am
Location: South Bend, IN (domerville usa)
Contact:

Re: Heads-Up

Postby Cane from the Bend » Tue Feb 15, 2022 7:46 pm

Spence wrote:It seems to me that for right now the SEC holds most of the cards. They B1G holds a few, nobody else has any. They only way the conferences can flip the script is to have an all or none approach to in season scheduling an playoffs. If the ACC, B12, B1G and PAC 12 decide to do it a certain way and they won't schedule with the SEC at all unless they agree, that reduces the SEC's leverage. Of course right now the SEC isn't really standing in the way. It is the other group not being able to stand as a group. It will be interesting to see what happens.



Though the SEC did threaten legal action against the other conferences over their agreement not to play vs them, claiming anti-trust.

The response was, "This does not fall on anti-trust, because we have a verbal agreement without a contract."

We'll see if this actually comes to pass. I'm just not confident that the other Power5 really meant it, or if it was merely posturing in the moment.

.
.
.
Cane... [__]

"It is only impossible until it has been accomplished." ... then it becomes standardized ...

Success is measured by results; whereas Character is measured through the means by which one achieves those results . . .

It seems the Rapture did come for two worthy souls:
In Memory of Grandpa Howdy
In Memory of Donovan Davisson

User avatar
Mountainman
Athletic Director
Athletic Director
Posts: 2862
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2018 9:42 am

Re: Heads-Up

Postby Mountainman » Tue Feb 15, 2022 10:09 pm

Cane from the Bend wrote:
Spence wrote:It seems to me that for right now the SEC holds most of the cards. They B1G holds a few, nobody else has any. They only way the conferences can flip the script is to have an all or none approach to in season scheduling an playoffs. If the ACC, B12, B1G and PAC 12 decide to do it a certain way and they won't schedule with the SEC at all unless they agree, that reduces the SEC's leverage. Of course right now the SEC isn't really standing in the way. It is the other group not being able to stand as a group. It will be interesting to see what happens.



Though the SEC did threaten legal action against the other conferences over their agreement not to play vs them, claiming anti-trust.

The response was, "This does not fall on anti-trust, because we have a verbal agreement without a contract."




We'll see if this actually comes to pass. I'm just not confident that the other Power5 really meant it, or if it was merely posturing in the moment.

.
.
.



Sankey does like to throw his weight around……… after the last CFP meeting where playoff expansion failed and a PAC12, ACC, BigTen ‘Alliance’ emerged he made a statement expressing his patience had a limit. Whatever that meant……. 8)


.
”We’re already in a time where the on-field aspect of College Football is almost a distraction. It’s an era filled with handwringing about player empowerment, NCAA deregulation, the transfer portal and realignment all while the sport generally moves toward a professional model.” ~ Dennis Dodd


Return to “General Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 53 guests