Extensive study of attendance in football

Say it all here
Forum rules
NOTICE: Please be sure to check the CFP Message Board Rules and Regulations and the Read Me page before posting.
User avatar
GoBoilers
Head Coach
Head Coach
Posts: 1374
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 3:52 pm
Location: New Braunfels (San Antonio area), TX

Extensive study of attendance in football

Postby GoBoilers » Tue Sep 20, 2011 10:00 am

with ramifications for re-alignment. Interesting read! http://thequad.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/0 ... ent-chaos/
The preceding statements are solely the opinion of GoBoilers and are, therefore, probably not based whatsoever on fact, research or more time in thought than what was required to physically type them. They're probably correct anyway, so you shouldn't argue too much, because otherwise he'll just blather on forever. On the internet Al Gore invented.

User avatar
donovan
Athletic Director
Athletic Director
Posts: 8634
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 6:41 am
Location: Pacific Northwest

Re: Extensive study of attendance in football

Postby donovan » Tue Sep 20, 2011 11:36 am

Pretty interesting. It is getting easier each week now for me to be Okay going and watching the local high school team. Like my interest in professional football died...I can see that happening with collegiate ball...
Statistics are the Morphine of College Football

User avatar
Eric
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 1:51 am

Re: Extensive study of attendance in football

Postby Eric » Tue Sep 20, 2011 11:48 am

donovan wrote:Pretty interesting. It is getting easier each week now for me to be Okay going and watching the local high school team. Like my interest in professional football died...I can see that happening with collegiate ball...


There's always the Ivy League :lol:
Running bowl/MSU/OSU record '05-present: 11-32

billybud
Athletic Director
Athletic Director
Posts: 10733
Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2006 12:25 pm

Re: Extensive study of attendance in football

Postby billybud » Tue Sep 20, 2011 12:06 pm

Or the MAC...

But hey, I am following Toledo this year because Austin Dantin (another Tallahassee boy at QB) has been sharing the starting role.
“If short hair and good manners won football games, Army and Navy would play for the national championship every year.”

User avatar
donovan
Athletic Director
Athletic Director
Posts: 8634
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 6:41 am
Location: Pacific Northwest

Re: Extensive study of attendance in football

Postby donovan » Tue Sep 20, 2011 2:51 pm

Bigger and more important entities than NCAA football conferences have fallen. Proverbs 16:18
Pride goeth before destruction, and an haughty spirit before a fall.

Texas and Oklahoma are no more part of the Pacific Coast than Utah and Colorado. Arizona and Arizona St was a stretch. To allow football greed to destroy traditions built over the years is right in line with the immorality of centralized control of the individual.

I think some Saturday afternoon High School football will be fine this week. Probably will watch Boise play Tulsa on the TV....Boise..they sold their soul...
Statistics are the Morphine of College Football

User avatar
Cane from the Bend
Athletic Director
Athletic Director
Posts: 5344
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 1:25 am
Location: South Bend, IN (domerville usa)
Contact:

Re: Extensive study of attendance in football

Postby Cane from the Bend » Tue Sep 20, 2011 3:53 pm

donovan wrote:Bigger and more important entities than NCAA football conferences have fallen. Proverbs 16:18
Pride goeth before destruction, and an haughty spirit before a fall.

Texas and Oklahoma are no more part of the Pacific Coast than Utah and Colorado. Arizona and Arizona St was a stretch. To allow football greed to destroy traditions built over the years is right in line with the immorality of centralized control of the individual.

I think some Saturday afternoon High School football will be fine this week. Probably will watch Boise play Tulsa on the TV....Boise..they sold their soul...



I've said something similar to my wife.

I told her, with 16 teams conferences, I'll likely reduce my time watching football to just 1 game a week; for the Miami games.

Other than that, the rest of the country will look rather bland. Not as much on the line every week, so not as much interest out of me.

.

.

.
Cane... [__]

"It is only impossible until it has been accomplished." ... then it becomes standardized ...

Success is measured by results; whereas Character is measured through the means by which one achieves those results . . .

It seems the Rapture did come for two worthy souls:
In Memory of Grandpa Howdy
In Memory of Donovan Davisson

User avatar
Eric
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 1:51 am

Re: Extensive study of attendance in football

Postby Eric » Tue Sep 20, 2011 10:16 pm

The most obnoxious thing about this situation is just how large it is all getting. How are you in the same conference if you have eight main opponents to go along with eight teams you never play in football except for a possible conference championship game? Even if they get two cross-division games, there is no conference unity felt whatsoever. It was big enough of a stretch for 12 team conferences where you don't play everybody.
Running bowl/MSU/OSU record '05-present: 11-32

User avatar
Spence
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 21235
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Chillicothe, Ohio (Ohio's First Capital)
Contact:

Re: Extensive study of attendance in football

Postby Spence » Tue Sep 20, 2011 10:27 pm

Eric wrote:The most obnoxious thing about this situation is just how large it is all getting. How are you in the same conference if you have eight main opponents to go along with eight teams you never play in football except for a possible conference championship game? Even if they get two cross-division games, there is no conference unity felt whatsoever. It was big enough of a stretch for 12 team conferences where you don't play everybody.


They will be 16 team conferences in name only. We are going back to the 8 team conferences. I'm not sure I hate that.
"History doesn't always repeat itself but it often rhymes." - Mark Twain

User avatar
Vileborg
Coordinator
Coordinator
Posts: 961
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 1:32 pm
Location: Austin, Tx

Re: Extensive study of attendance in football

Postby Vileborg » Wed Sep 21, 2011 9:20 am

Blah, why would you limit yourself to two 8 team conferences. Why not 4x4 with 3 in-conference, 3 roving conference, A North/South and East/West Divisional game, a CCG and 4 OOC.

Move the Orange Bowl and Rose bowl to Second weekend in December. Big 10(16) Champ Vs. Pac-16 Champ(Rose Bowl), ACC Champ Vs. SEC Champ(Orange Bowl). Each conference with it's four sub conferences could have a qualifier for the Divisional championship game. Each divisional winner must have 8 wins or be subject to losing their spot to a team on the outside. Max 1 substitute per conference.

Ex. Kentucky wins the SEC north but has a 5-7 record. Boise St. being ranked top 5 with 12-0 would take their spot and play the SEC South for birth in the SEC Championship game. If the SEC South team lost they would still be their Divisional Champs. If Boise were to win the CCG they would get the Orange Bowl bid but the loser of the CCG would still be the Conference Champion. Even if Miss St. won the SEC West with a 6-6 record they would be safe from replacement because Boise was admitted to their conference playoff system.

Losers of the Rose Bowl and Orange Bowl play in the Fiesta Bowl in Jan. Two top 12 BCS non playoff teams play in the Sugar. Should there not be a top 12 that didn't get into the playoff then any top 12 team not committed to the Fiesta, or NCG.

AND

There you have it. A 16 team play-off where the real winner is on the field.

User avatar
donovan
Athletic Director
Athletic Director
Posts: 8634
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 6:41 am
Location: Pacific Northwest

Re: Extensive study of attendance in football

Postby donovan » Wed Sep 21, 2011 9:28 am

Vileborg....I need to see this on a critical path flow sheet. One thing all this realignment may do...hopefully not what you suggest...but may do..is make wins count and dump that arbitrary SOS.
Statistics are the Morphine of College Football

User avatar
Vileborg
Coordinator
Coordinator
Posts: 961
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 1:32 pm
Location: Austin, Tx

Re: Extensive study of attendance in football

Postby Vileborg » Wed Sep 21, 2011 11:04 am


User avatar
Vileborg
Coordinator
Coordinator
Posts: 961
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 1:32 pm
Location: Austin, Tx

Re: Extensive study of attendance in football

Postby Vileborg » Wed Sep 21, 2011 12:11 pm

Image

I drew this on the computer. It should be slightly more legible than my hand drawn copy but the hand drawn has more detail.

User avatar
Spence
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 21235
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Chillicothe, Ohio (Ohio's First Capital)
Contact:

Re: Extensive study of attendance in football

Postby Spence » Wed Sep 21, 2011 8:56 pm

Vileborg wrote:Blah, why would you limit yourself to two 8 team conferences. Why not 4x4 with 3 in-conference, 3 roving conference, A North/South and East/West Divisional game, a CCG and 4 OOC.

Move the Orange Bowl and Rose bowl to Second weekend in December. Big 10(16) Champ Vs. Pac-16 Champ(Rose Bowl), ACC Champ Vs. SEC Champ(Orange Bowl). Each conference with it's four sub conferences could have a qualifier for the Divisional championship game. Each divisional winner must have 8 wins or be subject to losing their spot to a team on the outside. Max 1 substitute per conference.

Ex. Kentucky wins the SEC north but has a 5-7 record. Boise St. being ranked top 5 with 12-0 would take their spot and play the SEC South for birth in the SEC Championship game. If the SEC South team lost they would still be their Divisional Champs. If Boise were to win the CCG they would get the Orange Bowl bid but the loser of the CCG would still be the Conference Champion. Even if Miss St. won the SEC West with a 6-6 record they would be safe from replacement because Boise was admitted to their conference playoff system.

Losers of the Rose Bowl and Orange Bowl play in the Fiesta Bowl in Jan. Two top 12 BCS non playoff teams play in the Sugar. Should there not be a top 12 that didn't get into the playoff then any top 12 team not committed to the Fiesta, or NCG.

AND

There you have it. A 16 team play-off where the real winner is on the field.


I think that is what they are moving toward, except the conference winner is the first round of a playoff. I don't think the games will be at the traditional bowl sites. I don't see the B-10 schools wanting to be left out of hosting playoff games. Right now all the bowl games except one are exhibition. They don't matter. Make them matter and people will feel differently about playing 1000 miles or more for games in which they are the higher seed. I also think you will probably have an eight team playoff instead of sixteen games.
"History doesn't always repeat itself but it often rhymes." - Mark Twain

billybud
Athletic Director
Athletic Director
Posts: 10733
Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2006 12:25 pm

Re: Extensive study of attendance in football

Postby billybud » Thu Sep 22, 2011 6:41 am

The NFL has 4 team pods...16 team to a conference.

Much like this.
“If short hair and good manners won football games, Army and Navy would play for the national championship every year.”

User avatar
donovan
Athletic Director
Athletic Director
Posts: 8634
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 6:41 am
Location: Pacific Northwest

Re: Extensive study of attendance in football

Postby donovan » Thu Sep 22, 2011 10:34 am

billybud wrote:The NFL has 4 team pods...16 team to a conference.

Much like this.


Yes they do. And if the goal is to make Collegiate football like the NFL, there are many models to use. Maybe that should be the goal. But I do not think that is the goal nor should it be. The purpose of the NFL and the sole purpose is to make money through entertainment. Along with that is secondary economic gain for many businesses. The NFL, along with other professional sports compete for entertainment dollars. (And...in that arena, collegiate sports is a competitor.) But that is there sole purpose, if that stops, so does the entire industry.

If that is what the goal of all of this is for collegiate sports...well...they are well on the way. I am not a big proponent of this Student Athlete label. They are students. Period. We don't call them Student Debaters or Student Actors. These are what started out as extra-curricular activities. I do not want our institutions shanghaied by the greed and avarice of those that lie in wait to seduce minds of those being educated that learning is is unnecessary and takes a secondary role.

People are free to choose what they want to do. They can be bakers and candlestick makers, actors or athletes; just don't destroy a cornerstone of our country for the cupidity of a bunch of rapacious Saturnalians.
Statistics are the Morphine of College Football


Return to “General Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 43 guests