South Dakota > USC

Say it all here
Forum rules
NOTICE: Please be sure to check the CFP Message Board Rules and Regulations and the Read Me page before posting.
User avatar
Eric
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 1:51 am

South Dakota > USC

Postby Eric » Sat Sep 18, 2010 5:28 pm

If the transitive property is valid and if Minnesota pulls off the upset :lol:

I'm getting a little ahead of myself since Minnesota is losing 13-7 in the 3rd quarter, but they just picked off another Barkley pass.
Running bowl/MSU/OSU record '05-present: 11-32

User avatar
Spence
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 21235
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Chillicothe, Ohio (Ohio's First Capital)
Contact:

Re: South Dakota > USC

Postby Spence » Sat Sep 18, 2010 5:32 pm

This should pull SC and Kiffin from the rankings.
"History doesn't always repeat itself but it often rhymes." - Mark Twain

User avatar
Eric
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 1:51 am

Re: South Dakota > USC

Postby Eric » Sat Sep 18, 2010 5:34 pm

Spence wrote:This should pull SC and Kiffin from the rankings.


I wouldn't go that far. @ Hawaii, Virginia, and @ Minnesota would be three at least solid wins which is a lot more than many other teams have done in the top 25. But if they almost lose I'll be sure to drop them. Michigan is kind of the same thing, wins against UConn and Notre Dame are somewhat impressive, but their play against UMass today was disheartening. It is just one game.
Running bowl/MSU/OSU record '05-present: 11-32

User avatar
Spence
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 21235
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Chillicothe, Ohio (Ohio's First Capital)
Contact:

Re: South Dakota > USC

Postby Spence » Sat Sep 18, 2010 5:56 pm

Don't know if I would call those solid wins. SC shouldn't struggle to a team that lost to a 1AA team.
"History doesn't always repeat itself but it often rhymes." - Mark Twain

User avatar
Eric
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 1:51 am

Re: South Dakota > USC

Postby Eric » Sat Sep 18, 2010 6:00 pm

Spence wrote:Don't know if I would call those solid wins. SC shouldn't struggle to a team that lost to a 1AA team.


As Lou Holtz says, it's a different team every week :lol:
Running bowl/MSU/OSU record '05-present: 11-32

User avatar
Spence
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 21235
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Chillicothe, Ohio (Ohio's First Capital)
Contact:

Re: South Dakota > USC

Postby Spence » Sat Sep 18, 2010 6:38 pm

Lou has it wrong. He is getting on in years. What he meant to say is you play a different team every week. :)
"History doesn't always repeat itself but it often rhymes." - Mark Twain

User avatar
wvjohn
Coordinator
Coordinator
Posts: 830
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 3:06 pm
Location: Kermit, West Virginia Almost Heaven

Re: South Dakota > USC

Postby wvjohn » Sat Sep 18, 2010 6:41 pm

Spence wrote:Lou has it wrong. He is getting on in years. What he meant to say is you play a different team every week. :)


You took the words from my mouth. :twisted: :lol:
Big 12

FEAR NONE RESPECT ALL

IT IS A GREAT DAY TO BE A MOUNTAINEER WHERE EVER YOU MAY BE

User avatar
Spence
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 21235
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Chillicothe, Ohio (Ohio's First Capital)
Contact:

Re: South Dakota > USC

Postby Spence » Sat Sep 18, 2010 6:43 pm

WVU wrote:
Spence wrote:Lou has it wrong. He is getting on in years. What he meant to say is you play a different team every week. :)


You took the words from my mouth. :twisted: :lol:


Great minds WVU, great minds.
"History doesn't always repeat itself but it often rhymes." - Mark Twain

User avatar
WoVeU
Athletic Director
Athletic Director
Posts: 6074
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 9:55 pm
Location: New Braunfels, Texas
Contact:

Re: South Dakota > USC

Postby WoVeU » Sat Sep 18, 2010 7:37 pm

Eric wrote:
Spence wrote:This should pull SC and Kiffin from the rankings.


I wouldn't go that far. @ Hawaii, Virginia, and @ Minnesota would be three at least solid wins which is a lot more than many other teams have done in the top 25. But if they almost lose I'll be sure to drop them. Michigan is kind of the same thing, wins against UConn and Notre Dame are somewhat impressive, but their play against UMass today was disheartening. It is just one game.


Eric, are you into the cinnamon flavored crack early this season? Detroit must be feelig extra Chistmassy this year! I thought they normally waited until about Halloween?!?!?!?
Government exists to protect us from each other. Where government has gone beyond its limits is in deciding to protect us from ourselves.
If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.
R. Reagan

User avatar
Eric
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 1:51 am

Re: South Dakota > USC

Postby Eric » Sat Sep 18, 2010 7:53 pm

WoVeU wrote:
Eric wrote:
Spence wrote:This should pull SC and Kiffin from the rankings.


I wouldn't go that far. @ Hawaii, Virginia, and @ Minnesota would be three at least solid wins which is a lot more than many other teams have done in the top 25. But if they almost lose I'll be sure to drop them. Michigan is kind of the same thing, wins against UConn and Notre Dame are somewhat impressive, but their play against UMass today was disheartening. It is just one game.


Eric, are you into the cinnamon flavored crack early this season? Detroit must be feelig extra Chistmassy this year! I thought they normally waited until about Halloween?!?!?!?


Well I meant that they are solid wins, not good or even decent wins. I was just pointing out that other teams in the top 25 don't have any solid wins. A few that come to mind are Stanford, Texas, Arizona, and Arkansas at the time they were ranked last week.
Running bowl/MSU/OSU record '05-present: 11-32

User avatar
Cane from the Bend
Athletic Director
Athletic Director
Posts: 5344
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 1:25 am
Location: South Bend, IN (domerville usa)
Contact:

Re: South Dakota > USC

Postby Cane from the Bend » Sun Sep 19, 2010 4:00 pm

Texas Tech is a more staple win than Virginia. And the Cavaliers, so far, are the biggest win the trojans have right now.

And that win has been crosshaired with controversy.

Don't know how USC's performance, so far, has you stating the are good wins.

How well did Hawaii play against army?

Other than being in the Big Ten, what does Minnesota have to offer? Especially seeing as how they are projected to finish last in the conference... behind Indiana.

I'm not sure I follow your logic.

.

.

.
Cane... [__]

"It is only impossible until it has been accomplished." ... then it becomes standardized ...

Success is measured by results; whereas Character is measured through the means by which one achieves those results . . .

It seems the Rapture did come for two worthy souls:
In Memory of Grandpa Howdy
In Memory of Donovan Davisson

User avatar
Eric
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 1:51 am

Re: South Dakota > USC

Postby Eric » Sun Sep 19, 2010 10:46 pm

Cane from the Bend wrote:Texas Tech is a more staple win than Virginia. And the Cavaliers, so far, are the biggest win the trojans have right now.

And that win has been crosshaired with controversy.

Don't know how USC's performance, so far, has you stating the are good wins.

How well did Hawaii play against army?

Other than being in the Big Ten, what does Minnesota have to offer? Especially seeing as how they are projected to finish last in the conference... behind Indiana.

I'm not sure I follow your logic.

.

.

.


You have to check the time I posted this. At the time of the posting, Stanford had not beaten Wake and Texas had not beaten Texas Tech. Also, Hawaii on the islands is different than Hawaii on the road. Again, I wasn't saying that those were particularly good wins, I just meant that USC was mildly tested, much moreso than facing a run of the mill MAC/Sun Belt/FCS school.
Running bowl/MSU/OSU record '05-present: 11-32

User avatar
Cane from the Bend
Athletic Director
Athletic Director
Posts: 5344
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 1:25 am
Location: South Bend, IN (domerville usa)
Contact:

Re: South Dakota > USC

Postby Cane from the Bend » Sun Sep 19, 2010 11:36 pm

Didn't Minnesota lose to an FCS school? 8)

.

.

.
Cane... [__]

"It is only impossible until it has been accomplished." ... then it becomes standardized ...

Success is measured by results; whereas Character is measured through the means by which one achieves those results . . .

It seems the Rapture did come for two worthy souls:
In Memory of Grandpa Howdy
In Memory of Donovan Davisson

User avatar
Cane from the Bend
Athletic Director
Athletic Director
Posts: 5344
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 1:25 am
Location: South Bend, IN (domerville usa)
Contact:

Re: South Dakota > USC

Postby Cane from the Bend » Sun Sep 19, 2010 11:43 pm

Eric wrote:You have to check the time I posted this. At the time of the posting, Stanford had not beaten Wake and Texas had not beaten Texas Tech.


Maybe not:

Although, you did project Texas to beat Texas Tech... and Stanford to beat Wake Forest in your weekly picks; so it is kind of the same thing, isn't it? :)

.

.

.
Cane... [__]

"It is only impossible until it has been accomplished." ... then it becomes standardized ...

Success is measured by results; whereas Character is measured through the means by which one achieves those results . . .

It seems the Rapture did come for two worthy souls:
In Memory of Grandpa Howdy
In Memory of Donovan Davisson

User avatar
Eric
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 1:51 am

Re: South Dakota > USC

Postby Eric » Mon Sep 20, 2010 12:03 am

Cane from the Bend wrote:Didn't Minnesota lose to an FCS school? 8)

.

.

.


Yeah, but it was probably an aberration. Don't get me wrong, Minnesota is bad, but I doubt South Dakota has more straight up talent.
Running bowl/MSU/OSU record '05-present: 11-32


Return to “General Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests