Spence wrote:I believe God made whatever happened happen. So that means I believe in creationism. I just don't limit it. The creationist museum is is Cincinnati. It shows men and dinosaurs walked together. The science just doesn't back that up. I don't need to ignore science to believe in creation.
I do believe that nothing as complex as this universe could be random. That requires a more unbelievable leap of faith IMO.
WoVeU wrote:Evolution has more holes than a colander on the grand scheme. (Genetics research of late has shed evidence that there was no need at all for mutations to explain the jumps that already hindered the realistic likelihood of the theory.) Scientist are no different than Theologians, both are men. And when they can't full know something their mind immediately tries to look at the evidence they do have and fill in. The bad science of claiming the Earth to be flat, and the bad theology that the end of the world was set for 1000, 1984, or Jan 1, 2000 all come form the same human urges regarding knowledge and self-identity.
I looked for a while into the Neanderthal - Genesis link with findings in France. Very hard to say!
Let me remind that Adam was not the 1st man....absolutely not, the Bible makes no such claim. Man as a species was created on the 6th day, Adam on the 8th day. And I am not putting forth a race thing at all, like some other idiots have uttered, God loves all men, if he can love my stupid-clown-@55 he must love everybody else too! The first Adam was made from "the dust of the Earth"...dust would be a pretty good term to use for the smallest Earthly/Flesh particles 5 to 12 thousand years ago. And the Hebraic word more finitely translated as curve, taken to be referencing "rib" 350 years ago, could in today's scientific knowledge if the Torah was being translated for the first time, would very have likely shown up in the Queen Elizabeth Bible as "helix curve"...or..."DNA."
So much we don't know, everyday I watch technicians, managers, engineers and leaders make the monumental mistake of setting forth a claim of knowledge, often because, "they measured" something. The moment you measure something you change the universal condition, we can reduce this but we can not eliminate. The harder, further, or smaller the thing we seek to measure the harder this becomes. I g have grown tired of drivel about something 20, 200, and 2000 lightyears away. I grow tired of hearing of some element that existed for 1/1000000000000 of a second in a lab, I grow tired of Higgs-Boson updates from the latest research using some huge 88Jiga-Watt particle accelerator.
Men looking for fame, just men looking to live forever. Just men having hold of something another doesn't have. A man looking for greenbacks, same as the greasy haired preacher passing the plate and "giving answers" to the peons and plaudits he has surrounded himself with.
I like my circa 2000 Fluke Meter and a good old voltage or current reading that only has .001% error and gives me something I can use. Or the simple reading of a Proverb that gives me something I can use. Both usually tell me, "Keith, you still don't know spit!" As long as I know that, I know a whole lot....and I can get about my day and see if I can't get something did!
I didn't expect to see this upon clicking the "Boise State vs. Wyoming" thread, but I generally agree with Spence and definitely agree with WoVeU. I believe that God created the universe, the Earth, and its creatures. I do not believe in evolution, but I do believe that science must not be ignored when dealing with the question. St. Augustine stated that science and Scripture can be reconciled, and that those who use Scripture to counter a fact of nature, only show that they understand neither the Scripture nor the nature.
This means, that although I do believe in the Creation, I do not believe that the Earth is only six thousand years old, but billions of years old. My Pastor teaches similarly, and even will occasionally bring out a fossil or two to back up his argument. God created the earth to be lived upon, ages ago. It then
became (not was, but became - a different word in the Hebrew) void and without form. This was the
katabole, the fall of Satan well before the time of the creation of man, and the man Adam thousands of years ago...
Anyway, don't know how you got down this road, but I expect I just sent you a little farther astray along it.
