Eric wrote:Does Oregon and Auburn ring a bell?
Gus Malzahn's "system" is every bit the equivalent of a team like Oregon or Michigan. They spread you out and try to get their athletes in space. You can win with different styles I think. I don't think three yards and a cloud of dust is somehow inherently more productive than Oregon's spread option.
I'm not talking about three yards and a cloud of dust. I'm talking about a real pro style offense. The same offense Michigan has ran for years and years. I'm not talking Woody Hayes football, where I tell you I'm running off tackle left and you can't stop me. I'm talking about the same football Pete Carroll ran at SC, Florida State and Miami ran in the eighties and nineties. It isn't the "spread" necessarily. It is the read option. It is football dumbed down to it's lowest common denominator - watch the defensive end and react. I was never much for option football when it was popular in the late 60's and 70's and at least those option offenses had some thought go into them. CFB teams now are doing what mid majors used to do to complete when they didn't have the athletes to match up with the big boys. Boise State today looks more like a football team I reconize then does Ohio State.
The 85 scholarship rule and the reduced practice time rules are the cause of this mess. They need to let schools sign ten more players and they need to start playing something that resembles football again. I don't think what happened in the Mich-Illinois game was entertaining football. I thought is was a pathetic display of defense. This isn't something you can build a lasting program doing. That is why RR jumped off the ship at WVU. They needed to evolve their program and he didn't know how to do it and couldn't go forward without Pat White.