UMass May Be Going FBS

Say it all here
Forum rules
NOTICE: Please be sure to check the CFP Message Board Rules and Regulations and the Read Me page before posting.
User avatar
Eric
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 1:51 am

UMass May Be Going FBS

Postby Eric » Sat Dec 04, 2010 6:41 pm

To the MAC?

http://bostonherald.com/sports/columnists/view.bg?articleid=1299775&srvc=sports&position=2

It would be a great addition, I think. UMass would only be competing with Syracuse, Boston College, and UConn for Northeast presence. This move is being pondered because the Colonial Athletic Association is definitely moving its center of gravity southward with the dissolution of Northeastern and Hofstra's football progams. The conference only has Maine and New Hampshire in the northeast section, so those schools may abandon the league as well if the UMass domino drops. This seems like a calculated move to maybe pave their way to the Big East if they come into the MAC and play well right away, which is certainly possible (there's not much of a discernible difference between the two conferences in recent history).

If that's the case, one of the MAC East schools would probably relocate to the West, and my money would be on Bowling Green. So the new alignment may be:

East
------
1. UMass
2. Temple
3. Akron
4. Kent State
5. Miami OH
6. Ohio
7. Buffalo

West
------
1. Bowling Green
2. Toledo
3. Central Michigan
4. Western Michigan
5. Eastern Michigan
6. Northern Illinois
7. Ball State
Running bowl/MSU/OSU record '05-present: 11-32

User avatar
WoVeU
Athletic Director
Athletic Director
Posts: 6074
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 9:55 pm
Location: New Braunfels, Texas
Contact:

Re: UMass May Be Going FBS

Postby WoVeU » Sun Dec 05, 2010 11:00 am

I think all 3 programs could rather quickly climb in the FBS. College Football is still growing in popularity...the North East lags in participation. Looking at the programs, population densities, and the current climate. I think UMass and New Hampshire (and Nova) could all out pace UConn's growth rate.

Right now...the Big East is really the big Northern Mid-Atlantic and the Northeast has a whole lot of people and very little big time college football presence.
Government exists to protect us from each other. Where government has gone beyond its limits is in deciding to protect us from ourselves.
If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.
R. Reagan

User avatar
Eric
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 1:51 am

Re: UMass May Be Going FBS

Postby Eric » Sun Dec 05, 2010 4:43 pm

WoVeU wrote:Right now...the Big East is really the big Northern Mid-Atlantic and the Northeast has a whole lot of people and very little big time college football presence.



A lot of people, not a top-notch football population though :lol:

I think the number of colleges with serious football programs is generally representative of the football population as it stands right now. The South, for instance, supports four conferences (Sun Belt, C-USA, SEC, ACC) and even more individual teams within different conferences (like USF, Louisville, etc.). I don't think the Northeast could support much more than 4 FBS schools.

Also something interesting in that article, if UMass goes through with this, they are trying to get to host their games at Foxboro in Gillette Stadium. That's an intriguing possibility.
Running bowl/MSU/OSU record '05-present: 11-32

User avatar
armchairqb
Assistant Coach
Assistant Coach
Posts: 338
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2010 7:50 pm
Location: Isabella County, Michigan

Re: UMass May Be Going FBS

Postby armchairqb » Mon Dec 06, 2010 9:57 am

In the MAC, I could see the UMass move working.

On paper, the Big East seems like a reachable goal. UConn was able to do it and would have a natural rival with UMass.
"A complimentary breakfast isn't supposed to make you feel better about yourself." -Captain Obvious


Return to “General Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 33 guests