Year of the Gamecock

Say it all here
Forum rules
NOTICE: Please be sure to check the CFP Message Board Rules and Regulations and the Read Me page before posting.
User avatar
Derek
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 6110
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2005 2:04 am
Location: Brooks, GA
Contact:

Year of the Gamecock

Postby Derek » Sat Oct 06, 2012 7:22 pm

Well, that was swell....5 plays...touchdown. Way to go defense. :cry:

I've got a bad feeling about this.
They’re either going to run the ball here or their going to pass it.

The fewer rules a coach has, the fewer rules there are for players to break.

See, well ya see, the thing is, he should have caught that ball. But the ball is bigger than his hands.

- John Madden

User avatar
Derek
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 6110
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2005 2:04 am
Location: Brooks, GA
Contact:

Re: Year of the Gamecock

Postby Derek » Sat Oct 06, 2012 7:38 pm

This is gonna be bad. Georgia did not show up. I guess they thought SC would lay down on them, the way Vandy did?
They’re either going to run the ball here or their going to pass it.

The fewer rules a coach has, the fewer rules there are for players to break.

See, well ya see, the thing is, he should have caught that ball. But the ball is bigger than his hands.

- John Madden

User avatar
Derek
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 6110
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2005 2:04 am
Location: Brooks, GA
Contact:

Re: Year of the Gamecock

Postby Derek » Sat Oct 06, 2012 7:44 pm

4 and out....Good night all. :evil:
They’re either going to run the ball here or their going to pass it.

The fewer rules a coach has, the fewer rules there are for players to break.

See, well ya see, the thing is, he should have caught that ball. But the ball is bigger than his hands.

- John Madden

User avatar
Eric
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 1:51 am

Re: Year of the Gamecock

Postby Eric » Sat Oct 06, 2012 8:33 pm

I'm pretty shocked. I was a mild disbeliever in South Carolina. I didn't know if they were really top 10 material, but I think the difference in this game is just that they play better defense. Obviously Georgia is short handed, but I don't think they way they played against Tennessee was much of an aberration.
Running bowl/MSU/OSU record '05-present: 11-32

User avatar
Brian Roastbeef
Assistant Coach
Assistant Coach
Posts: 410
Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 2:58 pm

Re: Year of the Gamecock

Postby Brian Roastbeef » Sat Oct 06, 2012 10:12 pm

I'm amazed. I knew they were good, but not this good. I know Georgia has some injury issues, but this is more than can be explained by losing Bennett. South Carolina is scary impressive, and are making a statement out there tonight. They'll be getting a boost on my poll this weekend.

User avatar
WoVeU
Athletic Director
Athletic Director
Posts: 6074
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 9:55 pm
Location: New Braunfels, Texas
Contact:

Re: Year of the Gamecock

Postby WoVeU » Sun Oct 07, 2012 9:42 am

Eric wrote:I'm pretty shocked. I was a mild disbeliever in South Carolina. I didn't know if they were really top 10 material, but I think the difference in this game is just that they play better defense. Obviously Georgia is short handed, but I don't think they way they played against Tennessee was much of an aberration.


Shocked too. But I was more than mild in disbelief...I thought SC maybe 16th in the country.
Government exists to protect us from each other. Where government has gone beyond its limits is in deciding to protect us from ourselves.
If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.
R. Reagan

User avatar
donovan
Athletic Director
Athletic Director
Posts: 8634
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 6:41 am
Location: Pacific Northwest

Re: Year of the Gamecock

Postby donovan » Sun Oct 07, 2012 9:46 am

No sure why a guy I do not know bothers me. I am neutral on South Carolina....but I really thought Derek could kick it up a notch and give Spurrier a loss. But alas....my friend was no where to be found....
Statistics are the Morphine of College Football

User avatar
Spence
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 21230
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Chillicothe, Ohio (Ohio's First Capital)
Contact:

Re: Year of the Gamecock

Postby Spence » Sun Oct 07, 2012 1:54 pm

donovan wrote:No sure why a guy I do not know bothers me. I am neutral on South Carolina....but I really thought Derek could kick it up a notch and give Spurrier a loss. But alas....my friend was no where to be found....


Spurrier bothers a lot of people. He is a first class jerk.
"History doesn't always repeat itself but it often rhymes." - Mark Twain

User avatar
WoVeU
Athletic Director
Athletic Director
Posts: 6074
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 9:55 pm
Location: New Braunfels, Texas
Contact:

Re: Year of the Gamecock

Postby WoVeU » Sun Oct 07, 2012 10:22 pm

The Old Ball Coach talks, in several ways, like many guys at the Friday evening Monday morning water cooler. His problem is that he is a coach in the public spotlight.

(I try to give him a bit of a break lately...as he reminds me a good deal of the guys from 50 years ago. And I think this was a much better place then. And I think in the future there could be a federal mandate for coaches to spend at least 6 minutes in unadulterated flattery of the opponent before the game. And another 4 minutes after if you lose, 8 if you win, with an additional 12 minutes of apologetic and conciliatory speech. )
Government exists to protect us from each other. Where government has gone beyond its limits is in deciding to protect us from ourselves.
If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.
R. Reagan

User avatar
Derek
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 6110
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2005 2:04 am
Location: Brooks, GA
Contact:

Re: Year of the Gamecock

Postby Derek » Tue Oct 09, 2012 10:49 am

donovan wrote:No sure why a guy I do not know bothers me. I am neutral on South Carolina....but I really thought Derek could kick it up a notch and give Spurrier a loss. But alas....my friend was no where to be found....


I was yelling at the Tube, but they couldn't seem to hear me. 8)

Spurrier was very wise to keep his team quiet, which I'm sure he did. But I still don't like him either.
They’re either going to run the ball here or their going to pass it.

The fewer rules a coach has, the fewer rules there are for players to break.

See, well ya see, the thing is, he should have caught that ball. But the ball is bigger than his hands.

- John Madden


Return to “General Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests