theory: colleges that have a nfl team near by

Say it all here
Forum rules
NOTICE: Please be sure to check the CFP Message Board Rules and Regulations and the Read Me page before posting.

does having a nfl team in the same city have a negative impact on turn out to college games?

yes
5
71%
no
2
29%
 
Total votes: 7

User avatar
Spence
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 21256
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Chillicothe, Ohio (Ohio's First Capital)
Contact:

Postby Spence » Wed Jun 07, 2006 4:29 pm

Ohio State isn't far from Cincy, Cleveland, Indy, or Pittsburgh and they draw pretty well.
"History doesn't always repeat itself but it often rhymes." - Mark Twain

User avatar
Eric
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 1:51 am

Postby Eric » Wed Jun 07, 2006 4:35 pm

Usually the schools with NFL teams nearby use their stadiums (SDSU-Qualcomm, South Florida-Raymond James Stadium, Pitt-Heinz Stadium, Tulane-Louisiana Superdome, Minnesota-Hubert H. Metrodome, etc.). The farther from off-campus you get, the less of a home field advantage you have. That's why teams like Penn State have buit a great tradition because they have on-campus facilities.

I agree with your theory.
Running bowl/MSU/OSU record '05-present: 11-32

User avatar
Spence
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 21256
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Chillicothe, Ohio (Ohio's First Capital)
Contact:

Postby Spence » Wed Jun 07, 2006 4:51 pm

bar3cat5 wrote:
Spence wrote:Ohio State isn't far from Cincy, Cleveland, Indy, or Pittsburgh and they draw pretty well.

yea but i said the college team has to have a nfl team in it.


I think that having an NFL team splits the entertainment dollar up, so it would hurt one or both. College football is a different animal then the NFL, though, the passions and the reasons for going are different.
"History doesn't always repeat itself but it often rhymes." - Mark Twain

User avatar
Eric
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 1:51 am

Postby Eric » Wed Jun 07, 2006 8:33 pm

I think anyone can become successful anywhere, but an on-campus site generates a better homefield advantage. I would find it hard to be excited at the Hubert H. Humphery Metrodome for the Golden Gophers, don't you think?
Running bowl/MSU/OSU record '05-present: 11-32

User avatar
Derek
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 6115
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2005 2:04 am
Location: Brooks, GA
Contact:

Postby Derek » Wed Jun 07, 2006 8:48 pm

Definately not here in Georgia. College football is just big, stadiums still sell out.

It's irrelevant, here anyway, other places I might could agree.
They’re either going to run the ball here or their going to pass it.

The fewer rules a coach has, the fewer rules there are for players to break.

See, well ya see, the thing is, he should have caught that ball. But the ball is bigger than his hands.

- John Madden

billybud
Athletic Director
Athletic Director
Posts: 10735
Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2006 12:25 pm

Postby billybud » Wed Jun 07, 2006 9:29 pm

LOL...go to the BC football board in season...see all the Patriot posts...Boston is not a college football town...they don't even allow tailgating as we southerners know it.

colorado_loves_football

Re: theory: colleges that have a nfl team near by

Postby colorado_loves_football » Thu Jun 08, 2006 8:52 pm

bar3cat5 wrote:I believe it does for example from the big east you have, south florida, cincinnati, and pitt. If you compare the turn out form pitt to penn state
pitt- 40,272
psu- 104,859

pitt record last 4 years
30-19

psu record last 4 years
27-21

post what you think about my theory
Pittsburgh has tradition on it's side. Sure, there are a lot of people who attend PSU games.

There are 'intangibles' to any football team, regardless. Nebraska sells out if they are good or not. Colorado doesn't always sell out.
Nebraska has a larger seating capacity than Colorado does. Colorado plays in a state where they have professional football (that sells out).

I think if you have a good football program, it sells itself. Are we talking about the Pittsburgh of 2004 or 2005? Reason I'm asking, one was a BCS team, the other wasn't bowl-eligible.

User avatar
Jason G
Head Coach
Head Coach
Posts: 1141
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2005 2:07 am
Location: Pataskala, OH

Postby Jason G » Thu Jun 08, 2006 10:41 pm

I think each situation is unique to some extent. I know in the case of the University of Akron they have been talking about how one of their own, namely Charlie Frye, becoming the starting QB for the Browns (approx. 38 miles away) will actually help generate more fan interest in the program than what existed previously.

colorado_loves_football

Postby colorado_loves_football » Sat Jun 10, 2006 3:39 pm

Jason G wrote:I think each situation is unique to some extent. I know in the case of the University of Akron they have been talking about how one of their own, namely Charlie Frye, becoming the starting QB for the Browns (approx. 38 miles away) will actually help generate more fan interest in the program than what existed previously.
That actually was going to be my position, if anything it ought to make it more appealing to the fan. It might be one reason why Colorado and Colorado State have played in Mile High Stadium, rather than in their home field (last two years excepted). Professional sports, if anything should generate more interest in the game.
So, I don't really 'buy' into the argument that Penn St, necessarily is a bigger 'draw' than Pittsburgh. And they both play in Pennsylvania. What they should do is 'renew' their rivalry.

User avatar
Eric
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 1:51 am

Postby Eric » Sat Jun 10, 2006 3:50 pm

Well, look at it from this perspective:

Penn State sold out 97.7 percent of their seats.

Pitt sold out 61.96 percent of their seats.

Now, which is the better draw? It's clearly Penn State, but bar3cat5, can you verify if this is from last season, or all time average audiences?
Running bowl/MSU/OSU record '05-present: 11-32

User avatar
Spence
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 21256
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Chillicothe, Ohio (Ohio's First Capital)
Contact:

Postby Spence » Sat Jun 10, 2006 5:36 pm

The reason smaller D-1 schools play large D-1 schools at pro stadiums is that it is a way to not play the larger school at home and still make enough money for both schools to make money.

Ohio State is playing Toledo in Cleveland in a few years. Toledo wanted the game, but with only 26,000 in seating capacity, Ohio State couldn't afford to play in the glass bowl. It makes it work for both schools.
"History doesn't always repeat itself but it often rhymes." - Mark Twain

User avatar
Jason G
Head Coach
Head Coach
Posts: 1141
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2005 2:07 am
Location: Pataskala, OH

Postby Jason G » Sun Jun 11, 2006 11:15 am

My question about the Ohio State-Toledo game is why not Detroit? Certainly more Toledo fans would show up at Ford Field than at Browns Stadium. It just makes more sense geographically and you would think the Rockets would want a more pro-Toledo crowd than they are likely to find in Cleveland. Playing OSU in Cleveland is still just like a road game for Toledo. If it were Kent State or Akron 'hosting' OSU in Cleveland that would make more sense.

User avatar
Spence
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 21256
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Chillicothe, Ohio (Ohio's First Capital)
Contact:

Postby Spence » Sun Jun 11, 2006 12:34 pm

Jason G wrote:My question about the Ohio State-Toledo game is why not Detroit? Certainly more Toledo fans would show up at Ford Field than at Browns Stadium. It just makes more sense geographically and you would think the Rockets would want a more pro-Toledo crowd than they are likely to find in Cleveland. Playing OSU in Cleveland is still just like a road game for Toledo. If it were Kent State or Akron 'hosting' OSU in Cleveland that would make more sense.


Being from Columbus you should already know the answer to that question.
"History doesn't always repeat itself but it often rhymes." - Mark Twain

billybud
Athletic Director
Athletic Director
Posts: 10735
Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2006 12:25 pm

Postby billybud » Sun Jun 11, 2006 1:12 pm

Sometimes "outsiders" don't see things the same way a school's fan does. I always get irked when some writer equates FSU playing in the Orange Bowl as a "home game" for the Noles...

Right!

Of course it is 480 miles away...in the heart of Hurricane Country, our fierce rivals....

Columbus is about the same distance from Madison, Wisconsin. I bet if the Buckeyes were playing in a bowl in Madison, writers wouldn't describe it as a "home game"

User avatar
Spence
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 21256
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Chillicothe, Ohio (Ohio's First Capital)
Contact:

Postby Spence » Sun Jun 11, 2006 1:33 pm

That and the fact that Ohio State plays in state schools to in fact keep the money in state. Playing in Detroit wouldn't keep the money in state. While Toledo may think they are still in Michigan they are in fact in Ohio and it doesn't make sense for two Ohio teams to help the economy of the state of Michigan.

Playing in Cleveland helps broaden the appeal of Buckeye football in an area of the state where there is a wide variety of very good D-1A prospects. Ohio State could play 6 games in Detroit and they aren't going to broaden the appeal of Buckeye football in Michigan.
"History doesn't always repeat itself but it often rhymes." - Mark Twain


Return to “General Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 46 guests