Final Four per Mr. Congrove

Say it all here
Forum rules
NOTICE: Please be sure to check the CFP Message Board Rules and Regulations and the Read Me page before posting.
User avatar
donovan
Athletic Director
Athletic Director
Posts: 8634
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 6:41 am
Location: Pacific Northwest

Final Four per Mr. Congrove

Postby donovan » Sun Dec 07, 2014 11:51 am

I was reading Mr. Congroves articles, which I think are very good and very independent of common consensus and note this. Here is his predictions for the final four pairings.....

Rose
Pasadena, CA
$18,000,000 1/1/15 (Payout is per team) If they go to the finals, then add another 22 million for a total of 40 million....social conscience is gone.)
Florida State vs.Oregon

Sugar
New Orleans, LA
$18,000,000 1/1/15
8:30pm Alabama vs. Ohio State


I think he may be spot on. This is the money pairing for TV viewing. FSU v OR....battle of the QB's and all the other hype....Alabama v Ohio State Great traditional football teams is classic football...couldn't get better and in the final, regardless of winner, you have great stories to tell.

I would like these match ups. Think of the "excitement" if they have a TCU v Florida State....Both people in the stadium would be yawing, but Petticoat Junction reruns would be up in ratings.
Statistics are the Morphine of College Football

User avatar
Spence
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 21230
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Chillicothe, Ohio (Ohio's First Capital)
Contact:

Re: Final Four per Mr. Congrove

Postby Spence » Sun Dec 07, 2014 12:57 pm

Saban vs Meyer is a ratings winner. Especially with what happened the last time they met.
"History doesn't always repeat itself but it often rhymes." - Mark Twain

User avatar
donovan
Athletic Director
Athletic Director
Posts: 8634
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 6:41 am
Location: Pacific Northwest

Re: Final Four per Mr. Congrove

Postby donovan » Sun Dec 07, 2014 1:48 pm

He nailed it......
Statistics are the Morphine of College Football

User avatar
Spence
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 21230
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Chillicothe, Ohio (Ohio's First Capital)
Contact:

Re: Final Four per Mr. Congrove

Postby Spence » Sun Dec 07, 2014 1:52 pm

He usually does.

My top 4 would have been Florida State, Oregon, Alabama, and Ohio State.
"History doesn't always repeat itself but it often rhymes." - Mark Twain

User avatar
Derek
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 6110
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2005 2:04 am
Location: Brooks, GA
Contact:

Re: Final Four per Mr. Congrove

Postby Derek » Mon Dec 08, 2014 6:52 pm

donovan wrote:He nailed it......


There is definitely a "strategy" to maximize ratings with the way they did the rankings. Which makes me ask, how much can you trust them? :?
They’re either going to run the ball here or their going to pass it.

The fewer rules a coach has, the fewer rules there are for players to break.

See, well ya see, the thing is, he should have caught that ball. But the ball is bigger than his hands.

- John Madden

User avatar
Spence
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 21230
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Chillicothe, Ohio (Ohio's First Capital)
Contact:

Re: Final Four per Mr. Congrove

Postby Spence » Mon Dec 08, 2014 10:51 pm

As long as it done by a committee money will be a factor. I know I am a broken record on this issue, but they need to playoff all conference winners to make it fair. No committee, not even one with us in it, can determine who the best teams are in any given year. This committee acted like they wanted to drop an undefeated defending national champ for not beating teams by enough. Think about that. Ohio State got in because they score 3 touchdowns more than good sportsmanship should allow. The committee had Baylor behind TCU even though Baylor won head to head. They did it because they were sure Baylor would get beat by K State. Predicting the future should not be a job of the committee.
I believe the committee took their job seriously. I don't think they did a bad job picking teams. I would still think that if Baylor or TCU made it ahead of Ohio State. But know matter how good they try to do their job they don't have enough information to do their job. The conference champ will have beaten everyone in their conference. That is pretty good criteria for a playoff berth.
"History doesn't always repeat itself but it often rhymes." - Mark Twain

User avatar
Derek
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 6110
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2005 2:04 am
Location: Brooks, GA
Contact:

Re: Final Four per Mr. Congrove

Postby Derek » Tue Dec 09, 2014 12:20 pm

Spence wrote:As long as it done by a committee money will be a factor. I know I am a broken record on this issue, but they need to playoff all conference winners to make it fair. No committee, not even one with us in it, can determine who the best teams are in any given year. This committee acted like they wanted to drop an undefeated defending national champ for not beating teams by enough. Think about that. Ohio State got in because they score 3 touchdowns more than good sportsmanship should allow. The committee had Baylor behind TCU even though Baylor won head to head. They did it because they were sure Baylor would get beat by K State. Predicting the future should not be a job of the committee.
I believe the committee took their job seriously. I don't think they did a bad job picking teams. I would still think that if Baylor or TCU made it ahead of Ohio State. But know matter how good they try to do their job they don't have enough information to do their job. The conference champ will have beaten everyone in their conference. That is pretty good criteria for a playoff berth.


This is another reason I don't like Ur*an Mey*r, he will run up scores.

But as I've said before, I don't think this 4 team playoff was designed to solve problems, I think it was designed to create them and eventually get rid of the Bowl System with a larger playoff system.

I believe their goal is to bring terms like "Sweet 16" and "Final Four" to college football. And it ticks me off.

@Money
They’re either going to run the ball here or their going to pass it.

The fewer rules a coach has, the fewer rules there are for players to break.

See, well ya see, the thing is, he should have caught that ball. But the ball is bigger than his hands.

- John Madden

User avatar
Spence
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 21230
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Chillicothe, Ohio (Ohio's First Capital)
Contact:

Re: Final Four per Mr. Congrove

Postby Spence » Tue Dec 09, 2014 12:54 pm

Yeah, he put up 59 on Wisconsin and Andersen is his buddy. Hate to see what he would do if he didn't like you.
"History doesn't always repeat itself but it often rhymes." - Mark Twain

billybud
Athletic Director
Athletic Director
Posts: 10733
Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2006 12:25 pm

Re: Final Four per Mr. Congrove

Postby billybud » Tue Dec 09, 2014 4:06 pm

Congrove has his bowl payouts wrong...those are from the BCS era.
“If short hair and good manners won football games, Army and Navy would play for the national championship every year.”

User avatar
donovan
Athletic Director
Athletic Director
Posts: 8634
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 6:41 am
Location: Pacific Northwest

Re: Final Four per Mr. Congrove

Postby donovan » Tue Dec 09, 2014 4:46 pm

billybud wrote:Congrove has his bowl payouts wrong...those are from the BCS era.


Are they more or less.....
Statistics are the Morphine of College Football

billybud
Athletic Director
Athletic Director
Posts: 10733
Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2006 12:25 pm

Re: Final Four per Mr. Congrove

Postby billybud » Wed Dec 10, 2014 9:28 am

FSU gets $6 million for being in the playoff...the Rose pays nothing this year...it is a play off bowl.

The Rose is a "contract" bowl like the Orange and Sugar. In years that the Rose is not in the playoffs, they pay the Big Ten and the Pac 12 $40 million a piece
“If short hair and good manners won football games, Army and Navy would play for the national championship every year.”

billybud
Athletic Director
Athletic Director
Posts: 10733
Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2006 12:25 pm

Re: Final Four per Mr. Congrove

Postby billybud » Wed Dec 10, 2014 9:30 am

For example,,,This year the Orange is not a play off bowl and they pay out $27.5 million...next year they do not pay anything because they will be a playoff bowl,,,The CFP pays out $6 million.
“If short hair and good manners won football games, Army and Navy would play for the national championship every year.”

User avatar
Derek
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 6110
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2005 2:04 am
Location: Brooks, GA
Contact:

Re: Final Four per Mr. Congrove

Postby Derek » Thu Dec 11, 2014 10:09 pm

billybud wrote:FSU gets $6 million for being in the playoff...the Rose pays nothing this year...it is a play off bowl.

The Rose is a "contract" bowl like the Orange and Sugar. In years that the Rose is not in the playoffs, they pay the Big Ten and the Pac 12 $40 million a piece


$40 Million a piece??????? :shock:

How is college not just like the pro's now?????
They’re either going to run the ball here or their going to pass it.

The fewer rules a coach has, the fewer rules there are for players to break.

See, well ya see, the thing is, he should have caught that ball. But the ball is bigger than his hands.

- John Madden

User avatar
donovan
Athletic Director
Athletic Director
Posts: 8634
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 6:41 am
Location: Pacific Northwest

Re: Final Four per Mr. Congrove

Postby donovan » Fri Dec 12, 2014 3:44 am

This argument has been made on this board for years. Not all agree, but it is somewhat refreshing to here someone that is first hand involved express this opinion.

http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/12018531/air-force-falcons-coach-troy-calhoun-calls-college-football-playoff-un-american
Statistics are the Morphine of College Football

billybud
Athletic Director
Athletic Director
Posts: 10733
Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2006 12:25 pm

Re: Final Four per Mr. Congrove

Postby billybud » Fri Dec 12, 2014 10:46 am

Ridiculous bleeting from a coach of a team that could not compete and doesn't have the same quality of team. Has there been a national champion that is not now a team in the P5? If you discount the aberration that was BYU 30 years ago (they didn't play a top team), it was Yale in 1927.

You know what? I want to compete with my Jeep in the NASCAR 250.

Sure, I have no chance of winning, but those bustards will only race each other in the high power cars....Won't let me at least have a shot at it.
“If short hair and good manners won football games, Army and Navy would play for the national championship every year.”


Return to “General Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests